Supreme Court Halts Lower Court Proceedings in Sambhal Jama Masjid Case: Check Key Details of Court's Ruling

The Supreme Court held a crucial hearing on Friday regarding the Sambhal Jama Masjid dispute. The apex court ordered that the survey report of the mosque remain sealed, with no action to be taken until January 8. Emphasizing the need for peace, the court directed all parties to refrain from escalating tensions.

Background of the Case

The case gained national attention after violence erupted on November 24 during a survey at the Jama Masjid in Sambhal. Tragically, four youths lost their lives in the unrest. The survey was ordered by the Chandausi Court on November 19, following a petition from the Hindu side, which claims that the mosque stands on the site of an ancient Harihar temple. An advocate commissioner was appointed to oversee the survey.

On November 28, the Shahi Jama Masjid’s management filed a petition in the Supreme Court, seeking relief from the ongoing legal and survey proceedings. The matter was heard by a bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI). The Muslim said said the lower court passed the order without even hearing them.

Key Points of the Supreme Court's Order

The top court said the mosque’s survey report will remain sealed and unopened for the time being.

The CJI clarified that the court is not making any judgments on the merits of the case at this stage. The petitioners retain the right to challenge the initial survey order.

The court reiterated its focus on maintaining peace, stating that it will not pass any further remarks or decisions until necessary.

No further actions in the case are to be taken without explicit permission from the Allahabad High Court. The trial court is barred from issuing any verdict until January 8.

The Allahabad High Court has been instructed to hear the petition from the Muslim side within three days of its filing to ensure a swift legal process.

The court directed the government to form peace committees involving both communities to promote dialogue and prevent further violence.

The Supreme Court’s intervention highlights the judiciary's priority of preventing further unrest. The directives aim to balance the legal process with the urgent need to restore calm in the region. Authorities and community leaders have been urged to cooperate in maintaining peace, ensuring that legal proceedings do not fuel further conflict.