PM Modi Highlights Somnath Temple’s 1,000-Year Legacy, Rekindles Debate on History and Heritage
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Monday highlighted the 1,000-year legacy of the Somnath Temple, describing it as a powerful symbol of India’s civilisational resilience and cultural continuity. His remarks, made in the context of commemorative events linked to the historic shrine, have once again brought Somnath to the centre of national political and historical discourse.
Referring to the repeated destruction and reconstruction of the temple over centuries, the Prime Minister said Somnath represents the idea that India’s faith and cultural identity have endured despite numerous attempts to erase them. He emphasised that the temple’s survival reflects the strength of Indian civilisation rather than its vulnerability.
The Somnath Temple, located in Gujarat, is believed to be the first of the twelve Jyotirlingas of Lord Shiva. Its mention in ancient Hindu texts and its coastal location made it one of the most revered—and historically contested religious sites in India.
Temple was first destroyed in 1025 CE
The temple was first destroyed in 1025 CE by Mahmud of Ghazni, and was subsequently attacked and rebuilt multiple times over the centuries. Each reconstruction reinforced its symbolic status as a site of faith and resistance.
Somnath took on renewed national significance after Independence. It’s reconstruction was initiated by Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel which was completed in 1951 and inaugurated by our first President, Rajendra Prasad
This reconstruction was widely viewed as a cultural statement by a newly independent nation reclaiming its heritage.
The recent comments by PM Modi have triggered a fresh political debate. Supporters say highlighting Somnath is essential to understanding India’s historical experience and cultural survival. Critics, however, argue that history should be discussed with nuance and caution, warning against politicisation of religious sites.
Historians remain divided
Historians remain divided—some see Somnath primarily as a symbol of resilience, while others stress the need to contextualise medieval invasions within broader historical frameworks.
Today, Somnath is a major pilgrimage centre attracting millions annually.
It’s a protected heritage site.
The reference to Somnath comes at a time when debates around India’s historical narrative, cultural symbols, and national identity are increasingly prominent. The 1,000-year marker since the first recorded attack has added renewed attention and emotional resonance to the discussion.
Somnath’s return to the headlines shows that it is more than a temple—it is a historical symbol that continues to shape political speech and public memory. As India revisits its past, Somnath remains a reminder of how history, faith, and politics often intersect in the present.
By ANASUYA ROY